842 Route 25A, Northport, NY 11768
BLOG
Mediation Or Litigation In New York: How To Choose The Right Path For Your Divorce
Choosing how to navigate your divorce is one of the most important decisions you’ll make during the divorce process. When weighing divorce mediation vs litigation in New York, you’ll need to realize they offer different paths and that the right one depends on your unique situation, goals, and relationship with your spouse. In this article, we’ll unpack…
- The main differences between divorce mediation and litigation in New York.
- The possible benefits of divorce mediation over litigation.
- Whether mediation is still possible even after your divorce has gone to court.
What Are The Main Differences Between Divorce Mediation And Litigation In New York?
Divorce mediation and litigation offer two very different approaches to resolving a divorce in New York. Mediation involves both parties working with a neutral third party called a mediator. The mediator does not represent either spouse, but simply guides the couple through each issue, explains the relevant laws, and helps them come to mutually acceptable agreements. The goal is for the couple to maintain control over the outcome and reach a compromise together.
Litigation, by contrast, typically involves each spouse retaining their own attorney. The process often leads to court involvement, where a judge may decide unresolved issues. Litigation tends to be more formal, adversarial, and time-consuming than mediation.
How Does A Divorce Mediator’s Role In New York Compare To That Of A Divorce Attorney?
In New York, a divorce mediator is not required to be an attorney. Mediators can come from various professional backgrounds, including counseling. This comes as a surprise to many people.
That said, it is generally advisable to choose a mediator who is also a licensed attorney who also has experience as a divorce attorney. A mediator with legal training will have a better grasp of the applicable laws and can more effectively guide the couple toward informed decisions.
A mediator acts as a neutral facilitator, who will explain the options available to the divorcing couple. In some ways, a good mediator will act like a judge, not favoring either party. In contrast, in litigation, a divorce attorney represents one party exclusively, advocating for that client’s interests throughout the divorce process. Therefore, a mediator’s role is fundamentally different in both purpose and function from a divorce attorney’s role.
What Are The Top Benefits Of Choosing Divorce Mediation?
If both parties are willing and able to communicate and compromise, mediation can offer several advantages, including:
- Cost: Mediation is generally far less expensive than litigation
- Speed: Without court scheduling delays and extensive legal procedures, mediation often leads to much quicker outcomes
- Control: Couples can make their own decisions rather than leaving them up to a judge
- Less Adversarial: Mediation promotes cooperation and can reduce emotional stress, especially when children are involved
When Is Divorce Litigation Necessary For Couples Ending Their Marriage?
Litigation can be necessary when mediation is no longer a realistic or safe option. For example, if there is a history of domestic violence or abuse, the safety risks involved often make open negotiation impossible. Similarly, if one or both spouses are dealing with substance abuse issues, their ability to make sound, rational decisions may be impaired.
Cases where there is a significant imbalance of power, such as one spouse consistently dominating or intimidating the other, can also make mediation unproductive or unfair. And in high-conflict divorces, particularly those involving betrayal or deep emotional wounds like infidelity, the level of hostility may simply be too great for mediation to succeed.
Mediation may not be the right choice for high net worth couples or for parties that own a business.
What Are The Potential Risks Of Choosing Litigation?
Litigation isn’t necessarily risky, but it often comes with clear downsides when compared to mediation. It tends to be more expensive, as legal fees and court-related costs can accumulate quickly. The process is usually slower as well, sometimes taking many months or even years to reach a final resolution.
Another significant limitation is the lack of flexibility. Although, few cases actually go to trial, if there is a trial and a Judge ultimately makes the decisions, the outcome may not fully satisfy either party. One of the most overlooked but critical factors is the attorney you choose; hiring someone who unnecessarily drags out the process or resists compromise can make litigation far more stressful and costly than it needs to be. An experienced, resolution-focused attorney can help avoid these pitfalls.
A Second Chance At Resolution: Mediation During Litigation
Transitioning from litigation to mediation is rare and difficult. By the time a case has entered litigation, tensions are usually too high and trust too eroded for mediation to be effective. The reverse is more common: couples may begin with mediation and, if it fails, move into litigation.
That said, there is one notable exception. Many New York courts now assign court-appointed mediators, often former judges or attorneys, during litigation. These mediators act as neutral, quasi-judicial figures within the courtroom setting. Despite the adversarial context, their involvement frequently leads to productive outcomes, even in high-conflict or previously “damaging” cases.
Still Have Questions? Ready To Get Started?
For more information on divorce mediation vs litigation in New York, an initial consultation is your next best step. Get the information and legal answers you are seeking by calling (631) 430-4445 today.
CONTACT US
Highly Successful, Highly Rated Divorce Attorney Serving Long Island
Fill Out This Form To Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
